Equity

Large Value SMA

Russell 1000® Value Index
Benchmark name
1/1/2010
Inception date
Special Global Equity Team
Team
$144.2M
Strategy assets
Data as of 12/31/2024
SMA overview
Generating alpha via CPA-minded approaches
The Large Value SMA pursues long-term returns through investing in large-cap value companies with sustainable competitive advantages.

The SMA seeks to uncover market inefficiencies with a distinct investment approach. 

Key differentiators

  • Leverages a CPA-based investment process to analyzing financial statements
  • Performs rigorous bottom-up research to identify companies with sustainable competitive advantages
  • Employs disciplined valuation procedures

General facts

Weighted average market cap

$350.13B

(as of 12/31/2024)

Dividend yield

1.78%

(as of 12/31/2024)

Quick resources

From Q4 Expectations to Q1 Impacts

Bryant VanCronkhite, senior portfolio manager and co-head of the Special Global Equity team, kicks off 2025 by answering questions about New Year’s resolutions, the impact of Q4 events and expectations, and what lies ahead.

Transcript

Katie Schmidt: Hi, I'm here with Bryant to talk about what happened in 2024 and see what lies ahead in 2025. Hi, Bryant.

Bryant VanCronkhite: Happy new year, Katie.

Katie: Happy new year. Welcome to 2025. This year has just begun and markets are volatile. But before we dig into the markets, did you make any New Year's resolutions pertaining to the portfolios?

Bryant: I always have the same resolution every year because what I think is important to investment success is always following your disciplined process. The process is what allows you to have confidence in the outcome pattern. So, my resolution every single year is to make sure we don't deviate from the time-tested process that the Special Global Equity team uses. I guess a sub-point to that is that emotions are our biggest enemy when it comes to investment success. So, my other resolution is always to make sure we don't let emotions drive decision making. People all the time try to chase returns based on the FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) of what their neighbor has said about how much money they're making on a stock or they decide to sell out of their 401K equities because they're worried about the market falling. Those sorts of emotional biases can ultimately destroy returns. So, for us, follow the process, be unemotional, and drive towards consistent outcomes over the course of 2025.

Katie: Great. Those are excellent resolutions. 2025 is off to a little bit of a bumpy start. What do you see as the setup for the market and what does that mean for the path of returns?

Bryant: I think people were pretty excited about 2025 coming into it. We had this America First policy that's coming into place. You have deregulation in certain sectors that should be good for equity markets. You have lower tax expectations. And so, valuations were pretty high coming in—expectations of the fiscal side high. But counterbalancing that is a Federal Reserve (Fed) who's saying, whoa, I don't know what's going to happen right now. I'm not sure about tariffs. I'm not sure about tax policy. I'm not sure about budget constraints. And so, the Fed's pulling back saying we need to offset some of the optimism with realism. And so, they decide to probably push out rate cuts. And so, this tug of war is happening right now and it's putting pressure on the markets. I think what that means, though, is that the fiscal side has to deliver. Expectations are high for the government to push through policies that are going to drive the economy higher. And if it doesn't happen in the first hundred days, then I think we have a potential for a big reset in the market. So, there's a lot of risk coming in, given where valuations are. But the upside is that the Fed is there to support us. It is there to support the economy. In the event there is a bump in the economy, which I don't think there is right now, I think the Fed will get back into the game, start to cut rates again, and stimulate. But for now, expectations are high and it could result in some early volatility in 2025.

Katie: Great. Thank you so much. And to conclude, are there any sectors that look particularly interesting, given the setup and everything you're considering for entering 2025?

Bryant: Well, one of the industries that I think is in the crosshairs of what people think will be positive Trump-based policies is banks. Back in 2016, during the first election, a lot of the lower tax policies, the deregulation elements, drove a significant increase in the share prices of banks for good reasons. I think that same playbook doesn't work as well this time. Although the tax policy might get extended on the corporate side, I don't think we're going to see significant cuts in tax rates. So, it's not going to be a new positive for banks. Deregulation is a good thing, but I think a lot of the benefits accrue to the larger banks. So, one of my things is what am I worried about, which will be the small and regional banks and the valuation expectation setup there is a little bit optimistic compared to what I think is going to happen in 2025. Now, where am I more positive? Well, I’m sort of running into the fire, so to speak here, with healthcare. I think the nomination of RFK to the healthcare industry, to a leadership role in healthcare, is very concerning for a lot of people. There are some extreme views in many cases and it could put standard policies into question. And valuations across all of healthcare have dropped meaningfully. There are places now for stock pickers to go in there and pick up the scraps, if you will. And so, we don't want to go all in on healthcare right away, but I'm finding areas of CROs, for example, which are clinical research organizations, some of the labs, some of the medical insurance, all very interesting early on here in 2025. So, I think healthcare is appealing and you can be contrarian there, given some of the pullback we've seen late in 2024 and early in 2025.

Katie: Bryant, thanks so much for your time today. That was really insightful regarding healthcare. We'll keep an eye on that and look forward to next time.

Bryant: It was a pleasure. Good to see you.

Katie: Good to see you.

Performance

Average annual returns

Average annual returns

(as of 12/31/2024)
12/31/2009
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
Inception
Composite (Pure Gross)
-5.64
-2.36
17.41
17.41
8.39
10.96
10.19
11.81
Composite (Net)
-5.88
-3.10
13.88
13.88
5.16
7.68
6.94
8.52
Russell 1000® Value Index
-6.84
-1.98
14.37
14.37
5.63
8.68
8.49
10.75
S&P 500 Index
-2.38
2.41
25.02
25.02
8.94
14.53
13.10
13.88

One-month, three-month and year-to-date returns are not annualized.

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.

Calendar year

Calendar year

(as of 12/31/2024)
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Fund
17.41
14.60
-5.35
23.88
6.63
30.50
-4.62
16.83
8.25
-0.36
Benchmark
14.37
11.46
-7.54
25.16
2.80
26.54
-8.27
13.66
17.34
-3.83

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.


Performance and volatility metrics

Performance and volatility metrics

(as of 12/31/2024)
3 Year 5 Year 10 Year
Alpha 2.80 2.46 18.70
Beta 0.96 0.95 0.96
Downside Market Capture Ratio 91.94 94.69 96.94
Information Ratio 0.74 0.67 0.55
R2 0.95 0.97 0.96
Sharpe Ratio 0.26 0.47 0.55
Standard Deviation 16.35 18.06 15.39
Tracking Error 3.69 3.41 3.10
Upside Market Capture Ratio 100.59 100.03 102.72
Correlation 0.98 0.98 0.98

Composition

Portfolio statistics

Portfolio statistics

(as of 12/31/2024)
SMA Benchmark
Number of holdings 47 869
Top 10 holdings

Top 10 holdings

(as of 12/31/2024)
Security
SMA
Alphabet Inc. Class C
4.31%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
3.92%
Citigroup Inc.
3.87%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B
3.65%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.29%
Bank of America Corp
3.24%
AerCap Holdings NV
3.12%
Labcorp Holdings Inc.
3.03%
CBRE Group, Inc. Class A
2.81%
Microsoft Corporation
2.79%
Top 10 represents 34.03% of total net assets

Largest company weights are based on market value of the representative account and not necessarily held in all client portfolios. The information shown is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, a recommendation to buy or sell an individual security. A list of all holdings from the prior one-year period is available upon request.

Sector allocation

Sector allocation

(as of 12/31/2024)
Type
SMA
Benchmark
Cash & equivalents
1.38% -
Communication services
4.31% 4.36%
Consumer discretionary
5.68% 6.21%
Consumer staples
8.05% 7.90%
Energy
6.29% 6.72%
Financials
21.33% 23.07%
Health care
13.48% 14.19%
Industrials
17.35% 14.75%
Information technology
11.01% 9.29%
Materials
3.63% 4.17%
Real estate
4.75% 4.70%
Utilities
2.76% 4.63%

Sector weighting is based on a representative account within the Allspring Global Investments composite and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Documents

Literature Date
Fact Sheet 12/31/2024 Download
Our team
Meet the investment team

The team follows a fundamental approach of identifying companies with competitive advantages, sustainable free cash flow, and flexible balance sheets, helping deliver long-term capital appreciation.

Contact Us

We look forward to helping you with your investment needs

 

Market Risk: Stock values fluctuate in response to the activities of individual companies and general market and economic conditions. Management Risk: Investment decisions, techniques, and analyses implemented by the manager may not lead to expected returns of the team. Style Risk: Style factor exposure including but not limited to, beta, growth, value, liquidity, etc. can perform differently and shift in and out of favor through a market cycle.

Allspring Managed Account Services (the firm) is a unit within Allspring Global Investments and is responsible for the management and administration of the Allspring Funds Management, LLC, retail separately managed account portfolios (wrap portfolios). Allspring Funds Management acts as a discretionary manager for separately managed accounts ("SMA") and as a non-discretionary model provider in a variety of managed account or wrap fee programs (“MA Programs”) sponsored by third party investment advisers, broker-dealers, or other financial services firms (a “Sponsor”). When acting as non-discretionary model provider, Allspring Funds Management responsibility is limited to providing non-discretionary investment recommendations (in the form of model portfolios) to the Sponsor. The Sponsor may use these recommendations in connection with its management of MA Program accounts. In these “model-based” programs, the Sponsor serves as the investment manager and maintains trade implementation responsibility.