Fixed Income

CoreBuilder® Core Plus SMA

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Benchmark name
2/1/2016
Inception date
Plus Fixed Income Team
Team
$918.6M
Strategy assets
Data as of 3/31/2025
SMA overview
Foundational fixed income portfolio focusing on our best global ideas
The CoreBuilder® Core Plus SMA aims to deliver total return in excess of the benchmark by using a risk-conscious, relative value approach to pursue upside potential, produce income for shareholders, and manage downside risk.

Increasingly integrated fixed income markets coupled with segmented investor bases can create substantial opportunities to generate attractive returns by allocating across global sectors. 
 
Key differentiators

  • Uses a six-month investment horizon to anticipate market inflection points
  • Allocates up to 35% in Plus sectors and a minimum of 65% to Aggregate sectors
  • Seeks diversified and unbiased sources of alpha to generate compelling returns over market cycle
  • Innovative portfolio structure of the CoreBuilder, captures the benefits of both mutual fund and SMA investing into one hybrid vehicle 

General facts

Current yield

4.88%

(as of 3/31/2025)

Average maturity

9.32 Years

(as of 3/31/2025)

Effective duration

5.96

(as of 4/16/2025)

Yield to worst

5.37

(as of 4/16/2025)

Average credit quality

A+

Quick resources

Q1 review and Q2 outlook

Janet Rilling, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Plus Fixed Income team, discusses drivers of fixed income performance in Q1, tariff impacts in Q2, and changes to the team’s outlook and positioning.

Transcript

Hannah Rosencrantz: Hello and welcome to the Q1 2025 Plus Fixed Income team recap. My name is Hannah Rosencrantz, a portfolio specialist on the team, and today I'm joined by Janet Rilling, senior portfolio manager and head of our team. Thanks for being here, Janet.

Janet: Thanks for having me, Hannah.

Hannah: So, I think if I had to sum up what drove markets in Q1 in just one word, I would probably choose “uncertainty”. To get things started, would you mind taking viewers through a quick recap of what we saw in Q1?

Janet: So, I would agree on the word “uncertainty” for the first quarter. Investor sentiment really started to soften throughout the quarter after being pretty optimistic coming into the year. That was driven by things like the unknowns related to tax policy, immigration, and then, of course, the big one: tariff and trade policy. Despite the federal funds rate being unchanged, overall, Treasury rates did come down over the quarter. That was what really was reflecting the concerns about an economic slowdown. In total, that contributed to positive total returns in the fixed income market for the quarter.

Hannah: Was that the same across the board or were there some distinctions depending on yield curve and quality positioning?

Janet: Well, returns did vary depending on where you were on the yield curve, as well as the quality spectrum. So, first looking at quality, the higher-rated bonds within the market generally outperformed lower-rated bonds in the market. And then, those bonds with more duration—in other words, the bonds that have more sensitivity to moves in interest rates—outperformed those bonds with less duration. Now again, yields fell, which was helpful for total returns. Spreads, on the other hand—which is the compensation investors receive for taking on risk—we saw those widen. So, corporate credit spreads widened during the quarter, but they did still end the quarter at what we thought were somewhat elevated levels—meaning somewhat rich levels —and certainly tight versus long-term averages.

Hannah: Got it. Thanks for that Q1 recap. Again, sounds like a strong quarter for fixed income even amidst deteriorating investor sentiment. Speaking of which, of course, this video covers Q1, but we'd be remiss not to talk about what has been, shall we say, an eventful first week and a half of Q2. Can you speak to this at a high level and touch on how it may change the Federal Reserve’s, or the Fed's, trajectory amidst all of this?

Janet: Of course. Uncertainty has been on the rise throughout the first quarter and a big reason for that has been the unknown future of trade policy. Many were hopeful that the tariff announcement would lead to some clarity. Unfortunately, that has not played out. In fact, many more questions have arisen. Are we moving to a full blown trade war or is this going to be a back-and-forth negotiation? As a result, uncertainty seems to have continued to climb and along with it, market volatility. Notably, volatility isn't being driven by restrictive rates but by tariff policy. So, lower front end rates will not be a cure to what the ailment is right now. And the Fed probably agrees with that assessment. Recession risks, though, have definitely skewed higher through all of this, along with the risk that something could break, given the complexity of the negotiations and a lot of the uncertainties about how individual parties will react. Will the Fed step in if we run into a liquidity situation? We have seen in the past that to be the case. So, there still is likely some support from the Fed, but it's going to be a bit different than what we saw during COVID or the Financial Crisis.

Hannah: So, sounds like market expectations have shifted considerably, now pricing in potentially four rate cuts this year. Does that seem reasonable to the team? What are your thoughts there?

Janet: Well, our base case is for something less than that because we are still concerned about inflation. The Fed's hands are a little bit tied in this situation. We could see growth falling off, but at the same point in time, if the tariffs lead to price increases, there is concern about inflation. So, that is going to be a delicate balancing act for the Fed, but we do think they're going to focus on that inflation piece.

Hannah: So, given all of that, can you give viewers a glimpse into how that's translating into portfolio positioning?

Janet: Sure. So, from a positioning perspective, during the first quarter, our duration posture was mostly neutral. However, in mid-March, we began to move to a bit longer duration posture as a hedge against what we were starting to see is a downward revision in growth. We've continued in that trend as we moved into second quarter in terms of duration. For the credit allocation in the portfolio, we had been at a lower allocation and that really started in 2024 and carried over into the first quarter. And that was based largely on valuations that looked to us to be rich and really not giving any wiggle room in the event we had any type of risk-off event. So, that has served us well coming into the first quarter and gives us plenty of room to capture opportunities, which we think are continuing to unfold here. And we do expect continued volatility in the markets, so having that dry powder in the portfolio, we think, will be helpful.

Hannah: So, with volatility and uncertainty abundant and rising in today's markets, what final thoughts would you leave with viewers until we catch up again after Q2?

Janet: I think the main message is that we believe now is an opportune moment to invest mindfully in fixed income. We think that fixed income is well positioned to offer ballast within the context of a balanced portfolio, especially given that the starting point has ample yield, and that gives a cushion against spread widening and even potential losses from an equity portion of a portfolio. We also think that an approach like ours, which prioritizes flexibility and diversification, is especially equipped to capitalize on dislocations that periods of heightened uncertainty may provide.

Hannah: Couldn't agree more. Thanks again, Janet, for sharing your thoughts and I look forward to catching up after Q2.

Janet: Thanks, Hannah.

Performance

Average annual returns

Average annual returns

(as of 3/31/2025)
2/1/2016
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
Inception
Composite (Pure Gross)
-0.21
2.59
2.59
5.51
1.02
1.99
-
3.40
Composite (Net)
-0.33
2.21
2.21
3.93
-0.49
0.47
-
1.86
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
0.04
2.78
2.78
4.88
0.52
-0.40
-
1.59

One-month, three-month and year-to-date returns are not annualized.

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.

Calendar year

Calendar year

(as of 12/31/2024)
2024
2023
Fund
2.38
7.13
Benchmark
1.25
5.53

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.


Performance and volatility metrics

Performance and volatility metrics

(as of 3/31/2025)
3 Year 5 Year
Alpha 0.48 2.42
Beta 1.07 1.08
Sharpe Ratio -0.42 -0.10
Standard Deviation 8.12 6.96
R2 0.99 0.96
Information Ratio 0.52 1.57
Upside Market Capture Ratio 108.20 129.42
Downside Market Capture Ratio 102.19 95.99
Tracking Error 0.96 1.51
Correlation 1.00 0.98

Composition

Portfolio statistics

Portfolio statistics

(as of 3/31/2025)
SMA Benchmark
Number of Holdings - 13783
AMT 0.00 -
Effective Duration 6.07 5.96
Weighted Average Effective Maturity 9.32 Years 8.57 Years
Average Maturity - -
Average Current Yield 4.88 3.80
Yield to Worst 5.23 4.59

Portfolio holdings, credit quality, and characteristics are based on a representative account. CoreBuilder Shares are a series of investment options within the separately managed accounts advised or subadvised by Allspring Funds Management, LLC. The shares are fee-waived mutual funds that enable certain separately managed account investors to achieve greater diversification than smaller managed accounts might otherwise achieve. Allspring Global Investments, LLC, provides the sub advisory services for the Allspring Funds Management retail managed account product.

Credit quality

Credit quality

(as of 3/31/2025)
Type
SMA
Benchmark
AAA/Aaa
4.57% 3.35%
AA/Aa
53.11% 73.33%
A/A
16.74% 11.29%
BBB/Baa
16.64% 12.03%
BB/Ba
5.34% 0.00%
B/B
2.30% -
CCC/Caa and below
0.05% -
Not rated
5.96% -
Cash & equivalents
-4.72% -
Derivatives
0.01% -

The ratings indicated are from Standard & Poor's, Fitch Ratings Ltd., and/or Moody's Investors Service. The percentages of the fund's portfolio with the ratings depicted in the chart are calculated based on total investments of the fund. If a security was rated by all three rating agencies, the middle rating was used. If rated by two of three rating agencies, the lower rating was used, and if rated by one of the agencies, that rating was used. Credit quality is subject to change and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Maturity

Maturity

(as of 3/31/2025)
Maturity Range
SMA
0 - 1 year
2.47%
1 - 3 years
14.22%
3 - 5 years
26.81%
5 - 10 years
39.91%
10 - 20 years
10.92%
20+ years
10.38%
Derivatives
0.01%

Maturity distribution is subject to change and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Top 10 holdings

Top 10 holdings

(as of 3/31/2025)
Security
SMA
GNMA
7.19%
GNMA
6.81%
U.S. Treasuries
4.57%
GNMA
4.28%
GNMA
2.21%
ConocoPhillips
1.60%
Government Of The United States Of America 4.625% 15-feb-2035
1.57%
Oracle Corporation
1.56%
U.S. Treasuries
1.56%
Citigroup Inc.
1.55%
Top 10 represents 32.90% of total net assets

Largest company weights are based on market value of the representative account and not necessarily held in all client portfolios. The information shown is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, a recommendation to buy or sell an individual security. A list of all holdings from the prior one-year period is available upon request.

Portfolio composition

Portfolio composition

(as of 3/31/2025)
Credit Assets
Allocation
Benchmark
ABS
9.35% 0.45%
Agencies
0.43% 1.27%
CLO
0.54% -
CMBS
2.94% 1.50%
CMO
2.44% -
Corporate bonds
33.94% 24.02%
Derivatives
0.01% -
ETF/Mutual Fund
0.20% -
Local authorities
0.03% 0.73%
MBS
29.49% 24.87%
Sovereign
0.80% 1.03%
Supranational
0.12% 1.33%
Treasuries
19.72% 44.80%

Portfolio composition is subject to change and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Documents

Literature Date
Fact Sheet 12/31/2024 Download
GIPS Report 3/31/2025 Download
Our team
Meet the investment team

The team employs a sector specialist model whereby tenured investment professionals are supported by rigorous credit research to source opportunities across global fixed income markets.

Contact Us

We look forward to helping you with your investment needs

 

Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest-rate changes and their impact on the fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. Loans are subject to risks similar to those associated with other below-investment-grade bond investments, such as credit risk (for example, risk of issuer default), below-investment-grade bond risk (for example, risk of greater volatility in value), and risk that the loan may become illiquid or difficult to price. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to foreign investment risk, high-yield securities risk, and mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk. Consult the fund's prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Allspring Managed Account Services (the firm) is a unit within Allspring Global Investments and is responsible for the management and administration of the Allspring Funds Management, LLC, retail separately managed account portfolios (wrap portfolios). Allspring Funds Management acts as a discretionary manager for separately managed accounts ("SMA") and as a non-discretionary model provider in a variety of managed account or wrap fee programs (“MA Programs”) sponsored by third party investment advisers, broker-dealers, or other financial services firms (a “Sponsor”). When acting as non-discretionary model provider, Allspring Funds Management responsibility is limited to providing non-discretionary investment recommendations (in the form of model portfolios) to the Sponsor. The Sponsor may use these recommendations in connection with its management of MA Program accounts. In these “model-based” programs, the Sponsor serves as the investment manager and maintains trade implementation responsibility.