Fixed Income

CoreBuilder® Core Plus SMA

Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
Benchmark name
2/1/2016
Inception date
Plus Fixed Income Team
Team
$651.2M
Strategy assets
Data as of 12/31/2024
SMA overview
Foundational fixed income portfolio focusing on our best global ideas
The CoreBuilder® Core Plus SMA aims to deliver total return in excess of the benchmark by using a risk-conscious, relative value approach to pursue upside potential, produce income for shareholders, and manage downside risk.

Increasingly integrated fixed income markets coupled with segmented investor bases can create substantial opportunities to generate attractive returns by allocating across global sectors. 
 
Key differentiators

  • Uses a six-month investment horizon to anticipate market inflection points
  • Allocates up to 35% in Plus sectors and a minimum of 65% to Aggregate sectors
  • Seeks diversified and unbiased sources of alpha to generate compelling returns over market cycle
  • Innovative portfolio structure of the CoreBuilder, captures the benefits of both mutual fund and SMA investing into one hybrid vehicle 

General facts

Current yield

4.97%

(as of 12/31/2024)

Average maturity

8.93 Years

(as of 12/31/2024)

Effective duration

5.89

(as of 12/31/2024)

Yield to worst

5.36

(as of 12/31/2024)

Average credit quality

A+

Quick resources

Q4 review and outlook

Janet Rilling, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Plus Fixed Income team, discusses key markets events, drivers of fixed income performance in Q4 and changes to the team’s outlook and positioning.

Transcript

Hannah Rosencrantz: Hello and happy new year. Welcome to the fourth quarter in review for 2024 for the Plus Fixed Income team. My name is Hannah Rosencrantz, portfolio specialist on the team, and today I'm joined by head of and senior portfolio manager for the Plus Fixed Income team, Janet Rilling. Thanks, Janet, for being here.

Janet Rilling: Thanks, Hannah. It's a pleasure.

Hannah: Why don't we kick things off with a recap for viewers of Q4?

Janet: Sure. Well, fixed income markets did produce negative total returns for the quarter. That was largely driven by a shift upward in the yield curve. However, credit spreads did tighten. So, that did offset some of that move. Credit spreads are the compensation an investor receives for taking on additional credit risk. If you look across the fixed income space, however, it wasn't everything performing exactly the same way. Down-in-quality or lower-rated bonds performed better than higher quality. Shorter duration parts of the market outperformed the longer duration parts of the market. The drivers of the negative total return were really twofold. The first was the economic data. In general, it came out better than expected. Growth figures, for example, were a bit more elevated than the market or the Fed (Federal Reserve) expected. The employment market remained largely balanced. It really didn't soften too much. But inflation, that remained elevated. And that is a concern of the market and the Fed. So, that led to the second element, which was the Fed. The Fed did continue on its rate cutting cycle, which it began in the third quarter. It reduced rates two times in the fourth quarter. But at that December meeting, that 25 basis point rate cut actually had more of a hawkish feel to it as the Fed started telegraphing the fact that they were seeing the economic data be a bit more robust. As a result, the market adjusted its expectations for rate cuts in 2025, going from six down to two, and that as a result, led to the increase in the yield curve.

Hannah: Excellent. Well, thank you so much for that recap. Certainly, a challenging quarter for fixed income, but also some bright spots, as well. So, you did reference the Fed, as well as the adjustments, the downward adjustments in our expectations for their actions in 2025. As investors are probably all too familiar with, the Fed has certainly taken center stage as it pertains to fixed income conversations, particularly in the U.S. But given some of the shift in expectations, it seems like they may be kind of shifting into more of a supportive role in 2025. Can you maybe talk about this idea in a bit more detail and talk about what may be stepping into the void in 2025, as well?

Janet: Well, it's certainly true that the Fed has been the focus of the markets for the last several years. And that began first when the Fed started its rate hiking cycle. That was the fastest and the largest it's been in history. Then, we moved into a period of higher for longer. In other words, rates stayed high for a longer period of time than maybe people anticipated at the outset. And then, of course, in 2024, started the rate cutting cycle. So, the Fed was really the focus of not only the bond market but the equity market. Well, as we just talked about at the December meeting, the Fed has started to pull back on what it thinks it might do in terms of rate cuts in 2025. So, given that the Fed is more likely to be on hold for the next couple quarters, it does take some of the focus off of the Fed. Where is that focus going? Well, to the fiscal policy. We have a new administration. There's a lot of uncertainty regarding the policies that the Trump administration will be rolling out. And certainly, there is some rhetoric that has gone along with it. We think that's going to lead to more volatility and the markets will be much more focused on things like the tax policy, what's going on in regulatory policy, the potential for tariffs, and immigration. All of those feed into the growth picture, as well as inflation.

Hannah: Got it. So, while the Fed may not be completely out of the picture, certainly taking maybe more of a backseat in 2025. Why don't we finish things up with a bit of an outlook for 2025, as well as an update on positioning of our portfolios?

Janet: So, as we look at 2025, we are very constructive on the economy. Certainly, there was additional strength in 2024 that many didn't anticipate and we do see that continuing in 2025. That means the fundamental picture is good. That’s supportive of corporate credit. We see that credit metrics look pretty supportive. And also, default rates are on the lower end. So, that's a good backdrop. The technical picture looks good, as well. We've tested it already here in the beginning of January. A lot of issuance has come through the investment grade corporate market. It's cleared the market without really any hiccups. So, that's a positive sign. The fly in the ointment is valuations. We do see credit spreads being pretty narrow in the historical context, which means you're not being compensated as much for taking on that risk. The good news is overall yields are quite high in a historical context. So, an investor can really tilt more towards yield without having to reach down in quality and take on more of that credit risk. So, what we're thinking for 2025 is an up-in-quality tilt in portfolios. Don't give up the income, but do tilt to sectors that are more defensive and more up in quality. Things we're doing more specifically in the sectors, we’re overweighting structured product. Within structured product, we like agency mortgage-backed securities. The up-in-coupon part of that market is what we view as most attractive. We also like ABS, asset-backed securities. And then for credit, we are favoring European credit a bit over U.S. credit. That's both investment grade and high yield. But we're not at an overweight position there. We've just moved it more to a neutral position. So, all in all, we are constructive on 2025. We think higher yields, along with an up-in-quality tilt can be a good way to position a portfolio. We'll continue to focus, as we always do, on security selection, using our multiple levers to diversify the portfolio across the sectors and taking an unbiased approach in the management of the portfolio.

Hannah: Perfect. Well, thanks again for your time today and your thoughts. Looking forward to connecting with viewers again at the end of Q1.

Janet: Well, thanks for having me, Hannah. It's been a great conversation.

Performance

Average annual returns

Average annual returns

(as of 12/31/2024)
2/1/2016
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
Inception
Composite (Pure Gross)
-1.54
-2.78
2.38
2.38
-1.70
1.37
-
3.20
Composite (Net)
-1.67
-3.15
0.85
0.85
-3.18
-0.14
-
1.66
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index
-1.64
-3.06
1.25
1.25
-2.41
-0.33
-
1.32

One-month, three-month and year-to-date returns are not annualized.

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.

Calendar year

Calendar year

(as of 12/31/2024)
2024
2023
Fund
2.38
7.13
Benchmark
1.25
5.53

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.


Performance and volatility metrics

Performance and volatility metrics

Data is unavailable at this time, please check back later.

Composition

Portfolio statistics

Portfolio statistics

(as of 12/31/2024)
SMA Benchmark
Number of Holdings 468 13630
AMT 0.00 -
Effective Duration 5.89 5.96
Weighted Average Effective Maturity 8.93 Years 8.57 Years

Portfolio holdings, credit quality, and characteristics are based on a representative account. CoreBuilder Shares are a series of investment options within the separately managed accounts advised or subadvised by Allspring Funds Management, LLC. The shares are fee-waived mutual funds that enable certain separately managed account investors to achieve greater diversification than smaller managed accounts might otherwise achieve. Allspring Global Investments, LLC, provides the sub advisory services for the Allspring Funds Management retail managed account product.

Credit quality

Credit quality

(as of 12/31/2024)
Type
SMA
Benchmark
AAA/Aaa
4.73% 4.17%
AA/Aa
52.99% 72.34%
A/A
15.40% 11.20%
BBB/Baa
16.34% 12.29%
BB/Ba
5.43% -
B/B
2.44% -
CCC/Caa and below
0.06% -
Not rated
6.21% -
Cash & equivalents
-3.61% -

The ratings indicated are from Standard & Poor's, Fitch Ratings Ltd., and/or Moody's Investors Service. The percentages of the fund's portfolio with the ratings depicted in the chart are calculated based on total investments of the fund. If a security was rated by all three rating agencies, the middle rating was used. If rated by two of three rating agencies, the lower rating was used, and if rated by one of the agencies, that rating was used. Credit quality is subject to change and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Maturity

Maturity

(as of 12/31/2024)
Maturity Range
SMA
0 - 1 year
2.82%
1 - 3 years
14.04%
3 - 5 years
25.24%
5 - 10 years
37.35%
10 - 20 years
10.67%
20+ years
9.88%

Maturity distribution is subject to change and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Top 10 holdings

Top 10 holdings

(as of 12/31/2024)
Security
SMA
GNMA
7.32%
GNMA
6.99%
GNMA
4.37%
U.S. Treasuries
3.38%
U.S. Treasuries
2.84%
U.S. Treasuries
2.56%
GNMA
2.26%
U.S. Treasuries
1.75%
ConocoPhillips
1.64%
GNMA
1.63%
Top 10 represents 34.74% of total net assets

Largest company weights are based on market value of the representative account and not necessarily held in all client portfolios. The information shown is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, a recommendation to buy or sell an individual security. A list of all holdings from the prior one-year period is available upon request.

Portfolio composition

Portfolio composition

(as of 12/31/2024)
Credit Assets
Allocation
Benchmark
U.S. treasuries
17.62% 44.33%
ABS
9.30% 0.43%
Agencies
0.04% 1.17%
CLO
0.70% -
CMBS
3.02% 1.52%
CMO
2.18% -
Corporate bonds
34.01% 24.93%
Foreign government bonds
2.73% -
MBS
29.38% 25.13%
Municipals
0.04% 0.24%
Sovereign
0.98% 0.97%

Portfolio composition is subject to change and may have changed since the date specified. Percent total may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Documents

Literature Date
Fact Sheet 12/31/2024 Download
GIPS Report 12/31/2024 Download
Our team
Meet the investment team

The team employs a sector specialist model whereby tenured investment professionals are supported by rigorous credit research to source opportunities across global fixed income markets.

Contact Us

We look forward to helping you with your investment needs

 

Bond values fluctuate in response to the financial condition of individual issuers, general market and economic conditions, and changes in interest rates. Changes in market conditions and government policies may lead to periods of heightened volatility in the bond market and reduced liquidity for certain bonds held by the fund. In general, when interest rates rise, bond values fall and investors may lose principal value. Interest-rate changes and their impact on the fund and its share price can be sudden and unpredictable. Loans are subject to risks similar to those associated with other below-investment-grade bond investments, such as credit risk (for example, risk of issuer default), below-investment-grade bond risk (for example, risk of greater volatility in value), and risk that the loan may become illiquid or difficult to price. The use of derivatives may reduce returns and/or increase volatility. Certain investment strategies tend to increase the total risk of an investment (relative to the broader market). This fund is exposed to foreign investment risk, high-yield securities risk, and mortgage- and asset-backed securities risk. Consult the fund's prospectus for additional information on these and other risks.

Allspring Managed Account Services (the firm) is a unit within Allspring Global Investments and is responsible for the management and administration of the Allspring Funds Management, LLC, retail separately managed account portfolios (wrap portfolios). Allspring Funds Management acts as a discretionary manager for separately managed accounts ("SMA") and as a non-discretionary model provider in a variety of managed account or wrap fee programs (“MA Programs”) sponsored by third party investment advisers, broker-dealers, or other financial services firms (a “Sponsor”). When acting as non-discretionary model provider, Allspring Funds Management responsibility is limited to providing non-discretionary investment recommendations (in the form of model portfolios) to the Sponsor. The Sponsor may use these recommendations in connection with its management of MA Program accounts. In these “model-based” programs, the Sponsor serves as the investment manager and maintains trade implementation responsibility.