Fixed income

U.S. Ultra Short Plus Strategy

The strategy pursues total return in excess of the Bloomberg Short-Term U.S. Government/Corporate Index. It is mainly focused on Treasuries, agencies, MBS, ABS, and corporate bonds and targets duration close to its benchmark.

Competitive advantages

Investment horizon

The team uses a six-month investment horizon to anticipate market inflection points.

Multiple levers

The team strategically allocates, by objective, to a variety of alpha sources through security selection, sector allocation, and duration and curve positioning.

Unbiased approach

The team seeks diversified and unbiased sources of alpha in an effort to generate compelling returns over a market cycle.

Q1 review and Q2 outlook

Janet Rilling, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Plus Fixed Income team, discusses drivers of fixed income performance in Q1, tariff impacts in Q2, and changes to the team’s outlook and positioning.

Transcript

Hannah Rosencrantz: Hello and welcome to the Q1 2025 Plus Fixed Income team recap. My name is Hannah Rosencrantz, a portfolio specialist on the team, and today I'm joined by Janet Rilling, senior portfolio manager and head of our team. Thanks for being here, Janet.

Janet: Thanks for having me, Hannah.

Hannah: So, I think if I had to sum up what drove markets in Q1 in just one word, I would probably choose “uncertainty”. To get things started, would you mind taking viewers through a quick recap of what we saw in Q1?

Janet: So, I would agree on the word “uncertainty” for the first quarter. Investor sentiment really started to soften throughout the quarter after being pretty optimistic coming into the year. That was driven by things like the unknowns related to tax policy, immigration, and then, of course, the big one: tariff and trade policy. Despite the federal funds rate being unchanged, overall, Treasury rates did come down over the quarter. That was what really was reflecting the concerns about an economic slowdown. In total, that contributed to positive total returns in the fixed income market for the quarter.

Hannah: Was that the same across the board or were there some distinctions depending on yield curve and quality positioning?

Janet: Well, returns did vary depending on where you were on the yield curve, as well as the quality spectrum. So, first looking at quality, the higher-rated bonds within the market generally outperformed lower-rated bonds in the market. And then, those bonds with more duration—in other words, the bonds that have more sensitivity to moves in interest rates—outperformed those bonds with less duration. Now again, yields fell, which was helpful for total returns. Spreads, on the other hand—which is the compensation investors receive for taking on risk—we saw those widen. So, corporate credit spreads widened during the quarter, but they did still end the quarter at what we thought were somewhat elevated levels—meaning somewhat rich levels —and certainly tight versus long-term averages.

Hannah: Got it. Thanks for that Q1 recap. Again, sounds like a strong quarter for fixed income even amidst deteriorating investor sentiment. Speaking of which, of course, this video covers Q1, but we'd be remiss not to talk about what has been, shall we say, an eventful first week and a half of Q2. Can you speak to this at a high level and touch on how it may change the Federal Reserve’s, or the Fed's, trajectory amidst all of this?

Janet: Of course. Uncertainty has been on the rise throughout the first quarter and a big reason for that has been the unknown future of trade policy. Many were hopeful that the tariff announcement would lead to some clarity. Unfortunately, that has not played out. In fact, many more questions have arisen. Are we moving to a full blown trade war or is this going to be a back-and-forth negotiation? As a result, uncertainty seems to have continued to climb and along with it, market volatility. Notably, volatility isn't being driven by restrictive rates but by tariff policy. So, lower front end rates will not be a cure to what the ailment is right now. And the Fed probably agrees with that assessment. Recession risks, though, have definitely skewed higher through all of this, along with the risk that something could break, given the complexity of the negotiations and a lot of the uncertainties about how individual parties will react. Will the Fed step in if we run into a liquidity situation? We have seen in the past that to be the case. So, there still is likely some support from the Fed, but it's going to be a bit different than what we saw during COVID or the Financial Crisis.

Hannah: So, sounds like market expectations have shifted considerably, now pricing in potentially four rate cuts this year. Does that seem reasonable to the team? What are your thoughts there?

Janet: Well, our base case is for something less than that because we are still concerned about inflation. The Fed's hands are a little bit tied in this situation. We could see growth falling off, but at the same point in time, if the tariffs lead to price increases, there is concern about inflation. So, that is going to be a delicate balancing act for the Fed, but we do think they're going to focus on that inflation piece.

Hannah: So, given all of that, can you give viewers a glimpse into how that's translating into portfolio positioning?

Janet: Sure. So, from a positioning perspective, during the first quarter, our duration posture was mostly neutral. However, in mid-March, we began to move to a bit longer duration posture as a hedge against what we were starting to see is a downward revision in growth. We've continued in that trend as we moved into second quarter in terms of duration. For the credit allocation in the portfolio, we had been at a lower allocation and that really started in 2024 and carried over into the first quarter. And that was based largely on valuations that looked to us to be rich and really not giving any wiggle room in the event we had any type of risk-off event. So, that has served us well coming into the first quarter and gives us plenty of room to capture opportunities, which we think are continuing to unfold here. And we do expect continued volatility in the markets, so having that dry powder in the portfolio, we think, will be helpful.

Hannah: So, with volatility and uncertainty abundant and rising in today's markets, what final thoughts would you leave with viewers until we catch up again after Q2?

Janet: I think the main message is that we believe now is an opportune moment to invest mindfully in fixed income. We think that fixed income is well positioned to offer ballast within the context of a balanced portfolio, especially given that the starting point has ample yield, and that gives a cushion against spread widening and even potential losses from an equity portion of a portfolio. We also think that an approach like ours, which prioritizes flexibility and diversification, is especially equipped to capitalize on dislocations that periods of heightened uncertainty may provide.

Hannah: Couldn't agree more. Thanks again, Janet, for sharing your thoughts and I look forward to catching up after Q2.

Janet: Thanks, Hannah.

Composite performance

Average annual returns

Average annual returns

(as of 3/31/2025)
1/1/1989
1M
3M
YTD
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
Inception
Composite (Gross)
0.40
1.42
1.42
6.31
5.14
4.11
2.91
4.47
Composite (Net)
0.38
1.37
1.37
6.10
4.93
3.90
2.67
4.00
Benchmark
0.38
1.12
1.12
5.24
4.18
2.56
2.02
3.53

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.


Calendar year

Calendar year

2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Composite (Gross)
6.60
6.80
-0.25
0.60
3.25
4.39
1.92
1.86
2.08
0.88
Composite (Net)
6.39
6.58
-0.45
0.40
3.03
4.13
1.66
1.60
1.83
0.62
Benchmark
5.31
5.19
0.69
0.10
1.31
2.69
1.99
0.98
0.80
0.26

Performance is historical and does not guarantee future results. For more information, please refer to the GIPS composite report found in the documents section.


Our team
Meet the investment team

The team employs a sector specialist model whereby tenured investment professionals are supported by rigorous credit research to source opportunities across global fixed income markets.

Key risks

Market risk: Security markets are volatile and may decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, regulatory, political, or economic developments with different sectors of the market and different security types reacting differently to such developments.

Debt securities risk: Debt securities are subject to both credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk is the possibility that the issuer or guarantor of a debt security may be unable, or perceived to be unable or unwilling, to pay interest or repay principal when they become due, and credit risk increases as an issuer’s credit quality or financial strength declines. Interest rate risk is the possibility that interest rates will change over time such that when interest rates rise, the value of debt securities tends to fall and the longer the terms of the debt securities held the greater the impact of this risk.

High yield risk: If a strategy invests in high yield securities (commonly known as junk bonds), these securities are considered speculative and have a much greater risk of default or of not returning principal and their values tend to be more volatile than higher-rated securities with similar maturities.

Foreign securities risk: If a strategy invests in the securities of non-U.S. issuers, these investments may be subject to lower liquidity, greater price volatility, and risks related to adverse political, regulatory, market, or economic developments and may be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

Investors should know that this strategy deployed may be subject to additional investment risks. For important information about the investment manager, please refer to the investment manager’s Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request.

Contact Us

We look forward to helping you with your investment needs